I’m confused about the potential depth of my blossoming relationship
with local flora. I understand that gardens form an important component of urban
nature, and that they can also attract more nature in the form of birds,
butterflies, and other insects. But, all I knew about the grape hyacinths my
husband planted along our gateway path was that I liked them. This flower
appears early—good for the impatient naturalist (see earlier post)—, grows well
in difficult conditions, and smells good (although, really, am I going to kneel
down on the cold concrete to smell them? And, we have too few to use as cut
flowers.). Then things got more difficult. When I began researching them, I ran
into orders, families, species, and genera, which made me wonder exactly what’s
in a name? I’ve been content to ignore the larger implications of studying
plants. Do I need to know the scientific name of the chokecherry tree, for
example, to know that birds forage the berries? I want to know the function of
plants, shrubs, and trees, especially in relation to wildlife. Isn’t that
sufficient?
No comments:
Post a Comment